‘Brain Drain Through Deportation’ is subject of expert panel discussion

Anonymous — Tue, 27 Feb 2018 00:35:12 +0000

‘Brain Drain Through Deportation’ is subject of expert panel discussion Anonymous (not verified) Mon, 02/26/2018 - 17:35

The consequences of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program—and its uncertain future—is the subject of the next Social Sciences Today Forum at the University of Colorado Boulder.

Antman, Chapin and Sepúlveda

The event—titled “Brain Drain Through Deportation? The Consequences of DACA”—features three experts and is scheduled for Wednesday, March 7, at noon in Old Main Chapel on the �� Boulder campus. Each faculty member will speak for about 15 minutes and then answer questions. The event is free and open to the public. The panelists are:

Francisca Antman, associate professor of economics
Violeta Chapin, clinical professor of law
Enrique Sepúlveda, assistant professor of ethnic studies

Antman will summarize results from her research on the impacts of DACA on the schooling and labor-market outcomes of likely beneficiaries. The DACA program covers undocumented immigrants who were brought to the United States as children; these immigrants are sometimes called “dreamers.”

Chapin will discuss undocumented/DACA students in American colleges today, how DACA helped raise those numbers, and some of the history of state bills to allow undocumented students to get in-state tuition.

Sepúlveda will speak about “how DACA is part of a larger set of issues impacting Latinx students/youth, immigrant or not, and what this means for my work as an educational anthropologist and ethnic studies professor.”

The event is sponsored by the Center to Advance Research and Teaching in the Social Sciences (CARTSS) and the College of Arts and Sciences.

The Social Sciences Today Forum, a series during the school year, is designed to help the public gain broader perspectives and deeper understanding of human society and how individuals relate to the community and one another. This forum brings the knowledge and expertise of social-sciences faculty to the greater community and allows the community to ask questions of leading scholars.

The consequences of the DACA program—and its uncertain future—is the subject of the next Social Sciences Today Forum at the University of Colorado Boulder.

Traditional

White

Banning Muslim Travel: Why It Matters

Anonymous — Wed, 05 Apr 2017 00:03:41 +0000

Banning Muslim Travel: Why It Matters Anonymous (not verified) Tue, 04/04/2017 - 18:03

The 2017 executive order limiting travel to the United States from six majority-Muslim countries will be discussed by a panel of experts from the University of Colorado Boulder this month.

The event, titled “Banning Muslim Travel: Why It Matters,” is scheduled for Monday, April 24, at 4 p.m. in Hale 270 on the �� Boulder campus.

Faculty from four departments will analyze recent events in a historical, political and regional context, considering questions such as the following:

What historical precedents have allowed this order to be promoted as beneficial to U.S. citizens? What conceptions of citizenship, borders and religion facilitate the naturalizations of threat that undergird the executive order? What regional relationships are occluded or concentrated by conceiving of threats in this way?

The panel will include presentations and discussions by these faculty experts:

Aun Ali, Department of Religious Studies
Nabil Echchaibi, College of Media, Communication and Information
Rachel Rinaldo, Department of Sociology
Professor John Willis, Department of History

The event is sponsored by the �� Boulder Center for Asian Studies and the Center to Advance Research and Teaching in the Social Sciences.

Carla Jones, associate professor of anthropology and interim director of the Center for Asian Studies, organized the event to use the expertise among �� faculty to “contextualize the rhetoric and history that inform” the two travel bans initiated by President Trump’s Executive Order 13769.

“Although the bans claim to be structured around characteristics other than religion, the language is familiar to scholars of Muslim societies, including legal scholars, historians and social scientists,” Jones said.

“A consistent theme underscores much of this rhetoric: that humans who are Muslim are threatening and that a powerful method of control is to limit their mobility.”

Willis, a historian of the Indian Ocean region, has written extensively on the hajj and colonial-era attempts to control Muslim movement. Ali, from religious studies, has published widely on juridical debates and tensions in medieval Islamic law and is an expert in legal concepts of the nation-state, which challenge the secular conceptions of state authority that have defined Muslim law and Muslim conceptions of community as backwards.

Echchaibi is a scholar of media and religion and has written extensively on contemporary immigrant relations in France and the United States. Echchaibi is an advocate for minority religious rights and has also published widely on the representation of Muslims in the French and U.S. mass media.

Rinaldo is a sociologist who has written extensively on Islamic feminism in Indonesia. Although Indonesia is not among the six majority Muslim countries listed in the executive order, it is the world’s largest majority Muslim country. During the 350 years in which it was ruled by the Netherlands, colonial policy frequently used limits on travel, especially to Mecca, as a method of social and political control. These strategies bear strong resemblance in tone and content to contemporary policies, Jones said.

Jones, an anthropologist of Islam, gender and politics in Indonesia, will moderate the panel and contribute to the discussion.